|
Montessori
Research Summary
Copyright © 1996-2007 NAMTA.
All rights reserved. No one may copy or redistribute this text without
written permission of NAMTA. Other sites that wish to share
this content are encouraged to provide a link to this page on our
site.
Studies
in Support of Early-Childhood Montessori
In a 1991 study by Alcillia Clifford and
Carol Takacs, graduates of the Montessori Head Start program
at the Marotta Montessori Schools of Cleveland who had entered
the Cleveland Public Schools (CPS) were studied in relation
to their CPS peers. California Achievement Test scores for
Marotta graduates in grades one through eight were compared
with the overall scores of first- through eighth-graders in
the Cleveland Public Schools (mean percentile rankings for
grades one through eight). (No math tests were given in 1989.)
As these comparisons show, the former Montessori students consistently
fared better:
|
|


Clifford and Takacs (1993) also found Marotta Montessori
graduates far surpassing their CPS peers in eligibility for the gifted
program in the Cleveland Public Schools. Overall, in 1991, only about
four percent of CPS children qualified for the program by scoring
at or above Stanine 7 (75th percentile nationally) on the California
Achievement Tests, whereas the following percentages (by grade level
in 1991) of Marotta graduates qualified:
Grade One: 33%
Grade Two: 25%
Grade Three: 20%
Grade Four: 50%
Grade Five: 10%
Grade Six: 43%
Grade Seven: 30%
In addition to the Clifford-Takacs work, Dr. Mary
Maher Boehnlein (1990) reviewed 244 studies of Montessori pedagogy,
including 25 that focused exclusively on children of low socio-economic
status (SES). She found these studies to show overall that "low
SES children benefited significantly" from Montessori preschool,
even if they attended for less than the full three years. For example,
in long-range studies by Merle B. Karnes (1969, 1978, 1983), after
just one year of Montessori preschool, low-SES children showed "superior
performance on measures of autonomy and curiosity" over low-SES
children from other preschool programs (cited in Boehnlein, 1990).
Karnes also found that although low-SES children from Montessori
preschools showed no significant differences from their non-Montessori
peers immediately after the preschool program, in later years they
exceeded these peers in academic competence and achievement as well
as attitude toward school. Moreover, "significantly higher numbers
of Montessori children" completed school (cited in Boehnlein,
1990).
back to top
Studies
in Support of Montessori Elementary Programs
Other studies confirm these results and point toward
even better results for low-SES children who attend Montessori programs
throughout the preschool and elementary years. For instance, Dr.
Tim Duax (1989) studied the 1987 and 1988 graduates of MacDowell
School, a Milwaukee public-school Montessori program spanning ages
4 to 11. Of these students, 36% were eligible for the federal hot-lunch
program because of low parental income, and 50% were minority. Here
are the results of the Duax study:
| Achievement Level |
Stanine |
# MacDowell Grads |
MacDowell % |
Natl. Norms |
| High |
9 |
8 |
9.5% |
4% |
| High |
8 |
9 |
10.0% |
7% |
| High |
7 |
21 |
25.0% |
12% |
| Mid-range |
6 |
23 |
27.1% |
17% |
| Mid-range |
5 |
19 |
22.6% |
20% |
| Mid-range |
4 |
3 |
3.6% |
17% |
| Low |
3 |
1 |
1.2% |
12% |
| Low |
2 |
0 |
0 |
7% |
| Low |
1 |
0 |
0 |
4% |
-
The standardized-test scores (Iowa Test of
Basic Skills) of 84% of MacDowell graduates fell above the 50th
percentile, far above national norms.
-
Nationally, 23% of students scored in the "high
achievement" range; of MacDowell graduates, 44.5% scored
in that range.
-
While 23% of their peers nationally scored
in the "low achievement" range, only 1.2% of MacDowell
graduates scored in that range.
In another study, Duax (1989) asked 27 middle-school
teachers in three middle schools to assess 15 randomly-selected graduates
of MacDowell in comparison to peers in the same middle school with
no Montessori background. (The 15 were chosen to reflect the total
graduate population of MacDowell in gender, race, and SES factors.)
The teachers gave the Montessori-prepared sample above-average ratings
in relation to their peers on each of the 25 characteristics on the
survey (such as following directions, turning in work on time, listening
attentively, using basic skills, asking provocative questions, and
adapting to new situations). The MacDowell sample ranked highest
on 5 characteristics: using basic skills, being responsible, showing
enthusiasm for class topics, being individualistic, and exhibiting
multicultural awareness.
In summary, studies such as those by Takacs, Karnes,
and Duax show that Montessori education at both the preschool and
elementary levels benefits low-SES children by giving them higher
competence in basic skills, a better attitude toward school, and
a greater chance of staying in school than their non-Montessori peers
possess.
back to top
References
Boehnlein, Mary Maher (1990). Research and evaluation
summary of Montessori programs. In David Kahn, ed. Implementing
Montessori Education in the Public Sector. Cleveland: North American
Montessori Teachers' Association. pp. 476-483.
Clifford, Alcillia Jones, and Carol Takacs (1991). Marotta
Montessori Schools of Cleveland follow-up study of urban center
pupils. (Unpublished paper, Cleveland State University).
Clifford, Alcillia Jones, and Carol Takacs (1993). Marotta
Montessori Schools of Cleveland follow-up study of urban center
pupils years 1991 and 1992. (Unpublished paper, Cleveland State
University).
Duax, Tim (1989). Preliminary report on the educational
effectiveness of a Montessori school in the public sector. The
NAMTA Journal, (14)2, 56-62.
Karnes, Merle B. (1969). Research and development
program on preschool disadvantaged children. (Contract no.
OE 6-10-235). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education,
and Welfare, Office of Education.
Karnes, Merle, et al. (1978). Immediate, short-term
and long-range effects of five preschool programs for disadvantaged
children. Paper presented at the American Educational Research
Association annual meeting, Toronto, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction
Service no. ED 152 043).
Karnes, Merle, Allan Shwedel, and Mark Williams
(1983). A comparison of five approaches for educating young children
from low-income homes. In As the twig is bent: lasting effects
of preschool programs. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
back to top
|